People ( not this specific community, there are always such persons anywhere in the world ) will test things more eagerly if they read about ideas in research publications or researchers blog than some random poster on the forum. I am not sure you aware, but Healy for example has blog where he post his autoimmunity theories and even suggest experimental treatments. Research articles are freely accessible to anyone, not only some academics or organisation. This isn't 80s, 90s, 00s. There are people here who have medical background or self educated enough to properly read the science.themkal wrote: ↑Thu Jan 26, 2023 2:28 amThis is not possible, because the next thing will be people trying various supplements on themselves. I am more than willing to share these results with researchers and organisations (which I already have with Luisa Guerrini and Dr. Healy)sylv wrote: ↑Thu Jan 26, 2023 1:52 am It would be easier for us to give you some input to your hypotheses if you share what associations and data have your software generated.
Without it I'm not sure what is the real intent behind your post and what you expect from us.
You can upload data to cloud based server and provide a link if the attachment on this broken forum doesn't work
I think you are prejudiced to us. The community have obsessive stance toward personal safety after being damaged by safe and "researched" prescription drugs which passed gold standard clinical trails ( That means the scientific system itself in which you put your trust for "safety" is broken) . I believe we are all here against unsafely substance testing. I always suggest to wait and try natural healthy practices or remedies first before taking anything. Including drugs given by doctors who doesn't even know about the protracted and possibly permanent side effects of what they freely prescribe.
Hence this is not a valid reason to not share data - if your real intent is a brain-storming about your hypotheses, not marketing machine learning software.